Presentation schedule Group number/title : For this course, there are only 7 whole_class_meetings as shown below, no whole_class_meeting on other Fridays. |
Presentation Date (Friday, 3:30-6:15PM) |
Commentary group |
GP1:
香港青年世代的困境:躺平與內卷的文化衝擊 |
TBA |
4 |
GP2: 大學生旅遊偏好及文化影響因素研究:態度與市場激勵策略分析 |
5 |
|
GP3: 電子支付與無現金社會:香港在數碼轉型中的挑戰與機遇 |
6 |
|
GP4: 演算法繭房:探討社交媒體的同溫層效應對意見多樣性的影響 |
7 |
|
GP5: 探討大學生壓力管理策略對心理健康的影響 |
1 |
|
GP6: 生成式人工智能對大學生學習模式的改變 (How Generative AI is
Transforming University Students’ Learning Habits) |
2 |
|
GP7: 人工智能技術發展對大學生的心理影響 |
3 |
Assignments |
Submission deadline |
Content and
information See www.cuhk.edu.hk/ccc/ge/gecc4130 |
Time | Venue | comment |
Assignment1 (project proposal) |
15 June (Sun) |
4.1 Project
Proposal (about 3-5 pages) (*VeriGuide
NOT required)
format see www.cuhk.edu.hk/ccc/ge/gecc4130 |
|||
21 June (Sat.) GECC4130 Gp1:10:00 a.m. Gp2:10:30 a.m. Gp4:11:30 a.m. Gp5:2:00 p.m. Gp6:2:30 p.m. Gp7:3:00 p.m. Gp3a: 6:30pm. Gp3b: 23 Jun (Mon) 8pm |
Zoom Consultation #1 The zoom link can be found in Blackboard |
||||
Assignment2 (interim progress report) |
15 Aug. | 4.2 Interim
Progress Report (IPR) Form 進度
報告表 download form from www.cuhk.edu.hk/ccc/ge/gecc4130 |
|||
30 Aug. (updated)
(Sat.) for GECC4130 Gp1:10:00 a.m. Gp2:10:30 a.m. Gp3:11:00 a.m. Gp4:11:30 a.m. Gp5:2:00 p.m. Gp6:2:30 p.m. Gp7:3:00 p.m. |
Zoom Consultation #2 (for Phase 2: Inquiry & Analysis, mid to late Summer) | Mid-to-late-Aug | |||
Assignment3 (draft of the PPT) |
7 days before presentation date | 4.3 Presentation
Outline and Material (draft of the PPT to be
presented) |
|||
Within the week before presentation. | Zoom Consultation #3 | ||||
Assignment4 (report,reflective essay, intra-group peer evaluation form) 4.1 (Final report, group submission) 4.1 (Final presentation PPT file after presentation, group submission) 4.3 (reflective essay, individual submission) 4.4 (intra-group peer evaluation form, individual submission ) |
Two weeks after the presentation | Students
have to submit in English or Chinese (through https://blackboard.cuhk.edu.hk ): 1) Group submission: A project report (one submission for the group, 7000-10000 words in Chinese or English), See (*VeriGuide required). The Guideline can be found at www.cuhk.edu.hk/ccc/ge/gecc4130 2) group submission: Final presentation PPT file after presentation. 3) Individual submission: Reflective essay (individual, 800-1200 words in Chinese or English, *VeriGuide Not required), please put your name, student_ID, group number with project title at the beginning of the essay (VeriGuide NOT required) 4) Individual submission: Intra-group evaluation form (*VeriGuide NOT required) download form from www.cuhk.edu.hk/ccc/ge/gecc4130 Report Submission a) Upload to VeriGuide.
All students of the same group should be asked to sign
the declaration, each of whom is responsible should
there be any plagiarized contents in the group
project, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the
declaration and whether he/she has contributed
directly or indirectly to the plagiarized contents. b) Submission to Course
Supervisor. The
Project report, together with its signed (all members)
declaration form and other paperworks which includes
individual reflective essay and intra-group evaluation
forms, should be submitted to Course Supervisor within
2 weeks after presentation (unless other specified by
supervisor) c) Duplicate submission to
College Blackboard. For project report archive and the
maintenance of the CCGE report database, students have
to upload their project report (full report with cover
page, content, bibliography, etc.) at
the College GECC4130 centralized Blackboard website. |
|
Lesson Arrangement |
Recommended time
allocation (2hr – 2hrs
45mins)
|
(i) |
Presentation by the
presentation-group
|
40 minutes |
(ii) |
Commentary by
the commentary-group /////// additional
details/////// Commentary session (20
minutes) The commentary group
can ask questions concerning the following
recommended topics. I suggest each student in
the commentary group concentrates on one topic
and asks relevant questions during the
commentary session. I expect each member of the
commentary group will ask at least two
questions. These are suggested
topics. 1)
Problem definition: a.
Is it well defined and clear? b.
Is it logical? 2)
Execution of the research: a.
Is the questionnaire well designed and written? b.
Is the data collection process good enough? 3)
Analysis of data a.
Does the research collect enough data? b.
Does the data collected give enough information
to draw the conclusion? c.
Any suggestion on data collection? 4)
Comment on suggestion and conclusion a.
Is the conclusion good enough? b.
Is the final suggestion given by the
presentation group gives enough guideline for
the audience? |
20 minutes |
|
Break (Optional) |
10 minutes |
(iii) |
Open Discussion Open
to all groups. Discussion
led by the commentary group and then the
presentation group. /////// additional
details////////
Part (iii-a): (20
Minutes) to be organized by the commentary
group which must prepare
and raise questions concerning the presentation
and invite all other students to give comments
and discuss the problem.
Part (iii-c) (5
minutes) each group will discuss among
themselves to discuss the topic covered
today. Part
(iii-d): (5 minutes): All non-presentation and
non-commentary group (totally 5 groups) will
present their opinion about the research today.
|
50 minutes or above |
(iv) |
Polling and Conclusion
|
5 minutes |
Assessment Type |
Assessment
Task |
Percentage |
Remark |
Project
40% |
Consultation |
10% (Group) |
Phase 1-3 · At least TWO
consultations. · Submit Interim
Progress Report (IPR) Form in late summer. |
Proposal |
10% (Group) |
Phase 1
paperwork |
|
Project report |
20% (Group) |
Phase 3
paperwork |
|
Presentation
20% |
Oral
presentation |
20%
(Individual) |
Phase 3
in-class activities |
Discussion
25% |
Commentary |
10%
(Individual) |
Phase 3
in-class activities |
Open
discussion |
15%
(Individual) |
||
Essay 5% |
Reflective
essay |
5%
(Individual) |
Phase 3
paperwork |
Others 10% |
Intra-Group |
10%
(Individual) |
Students should
confirm the exact due dates with their supervisor and submit the
assignments on time.
According to a previous opinion poll
among teachers, the following arrangements for open discussion
have been recommended:
a) Free discussion
among all students attending the class.
b) Discussion
among group representatives (one for each group).
c) Apart from group discussions, students may grade
their counterparts by peer grading and comments.